User experience and motivation with engineering design challenges in general chemistry laboratory

Table 4 Summary of correlation coefficients

Measure	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1. Difficulty	2.480	.960	–
2. Effort	3.160	.839	.317^**	–
3. Satisfaction	3.840	.917	− .280^**	.015	–
4. Collaboration	4.170	.756	− .174^**	.071^**	.552^**	–
5. Feel like an engineer	4.030	.854	− .124^**	.112^**	.532^**	.621^**	–
6. Help from the teaching assistant	4.700	.608	− .085	.008	.293^**	.376^**	.318^**	–
7. Task value	11.942	2.396	− .199^**	.024	.590^**	.593^**	.631^**	.350^**	–
8. Self-confidence	4.30	.784	− .355^**	− .088^**	.419^**	.416^**	.393^**	.326^**	.463^**	–
9. Gender	.460	.499	.033	− .007	− .0100	.019	− .016	.020	.012	− .107^**	–
10. URM status	.290	.456	− .039	.090^**	.092^**	.061^**	.069^**	− .028	.053^**	− .027	− .063^**	–

^**Correlation is significant at the .01 level (2-tailed)
Note: The variables task difficulty, effort, satisfaction, collaboration, feel like an engineer, help from the teaching assistant and self-confidence were assessed on a continuous scale ranging from 1 to 5. Task value was assessed on a continuous scale ranging from 3 to 15. For all scales, higher values are indicative of more positive response. Binary codes were created for gender (Male = 0; Female = 1) and URM status (non-URM = 0; URM = 1)

ISSN: 2524-8502